My other blog is http://i-came-i-saw-i-wrote-it.blogspot.com/ which is an archive of my works.......... Robert Ho REQUEST FOR STATEMENTS at http://roberthorequestforstatements.blogspot.com/2011/01/robert-ho-request-for-statements.html

Labels

About Me

My photo
My archive of works is at http://i-came-i-saw-i-wrote-it.blogspot.com/

18 June 2009

"A Video RH on LKY LHL WKS cheating elections + PoBoB and CCTV Ideas"

video

Also on YouTube for fullscreen:

RH: LKY 2A1B WKS Singapore Govt repeatedly rigged elections Pt1 of 2.wmv

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jQCab3QZbBk

RH: LKY 2A1B WKS Singapore Govt repeatedly rigged elections Pt 2.wmv

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VY8LepVK4K8
.
RH: What is or who is 2A1B? Well, after the 2 full years in National Junior College specially built for him, with the best handpicked Principal and teachers, LHL took only 3 subjects and scored 2As and a B, on the basis of which he was awarded the President's Scholarship as well as offered all the other top scholarships in the country. Nepotism of course, with his father LIE KY pulling the strings since such results of 2A1B is easily bettered by >half of all students who take the A Level exam. So I hereby honour LHL by giving him the honorific "2A1B". It is a fitting reminder of LIE KY famous purported "meritocracy". Those who prefer a fuller honorific should write thus: "the 2A1B PS LHL" representing "the 2As 1B President's Scholar LEE Hsien Loong".

///////////////////////////

[Added 24 Feb 2011]:-- PoBoB IDEA + CCTV IDEA MAKE ELECTIONS FOOLPROOF, UNCHEATABLE, WORLDWIDE:


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Robert HO
Date: 2011/2/11

Subject: My PIN idea to prevent election rigging: Dear Wikipedia, did you receive this previous email and are you actioning on it? Thanks.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Robert HO
Date: 11 February 2011 21:15

Subject: Dear Wikipedia, did you receive this previous email and are you actioning on it? Thanks.

To: unblock-en-l@lists.wikimedia.org

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Robert HO
Date: 31 January 2011 18:27

Subject: I invented a foolproof system to prevent election rigging. Please turn this idea into a Wikipedia article or tag on to existing Election-related articles, thanks

To: unblock-en-l@lists.wikimedia.org

Dear Wikipedia,

I have invented quite a few ideas and systems in the last couple of years, proofs in my blog "I came, I saw, I solved it" at url http://i-came-i-saw-i-solved-it.blogspot.com/ . Please read all those blog posts beginning with the word "Idea: ".

Among the most important ideas and systems I have invented is a system to prevent Election Rigging, which is below in red texts. Since a govt that cheats in election to be, or remain in, govt does so much evil, I hope you can take this idea and system and turn it into a Wikipedia article, or tag this onto any article/s on Elections and Govt Legitimacy, etc. I will be honoured if you do so.

I have taken this idea and system about as far as I can push it, solo. I can no longer do any more with it, so use it in any way you want, without any need for attribution to me. [You can just say this system is from a "grateful Wikipedia user"].

Since Wikipedia is a trusted source and read by thousands every minute, you will thus help to make elections fairer worldwide, forever. This is no mean feat. Since elections were invented, Man has debased it, often turning into a sham show, as in Singapore where I live. Thus, Wikipedia can make the world a better place, by making elections fairer thus preventing illegitimate govts from seizing power by cheating. Another signal achievement to the God's work you are already doing. If you want to jump to the idea/system, it is in RED. Thanks.

Robert HO
28 Bukit Batok Street 52
#20-03 Guilin View
Singapore 659248
Tel: +65-68989553
CellPhone: +65-90127417

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Robert HO
Date: 2011/1/10

Subject: My Letter/Article on Temasek Review exposing LIE KY LHL WKS election cheatings hacked/hidden from TR readers

Dear Temasek Review,

1. Thank you for publishing my Letter/Article which you entitled:

"Entire Prime Minister Office on holiday?"

[January 7th, 2011 | Author: Contributions]

http://www.temasekreview.com/2011/01/07/entire-prime-minister-office-on-holiday/

2. This is a very, very, very, IMPORTANT article, probably one of the most important ever to be published by Temasek Review, since it exposes LIE KY LHL WKS repeated election cheatings over 51 years of mis-rule. You can expect them to do anything and everything to suppress it AND THEY HAVE.

3. I noted that my Letter/Article was published on Friday 7 Jan 2010 and immediately garnered 17 Comments and a total of some two dozen 'Like/Dislike' or "Thumbs Up/Thumbs Down' clicks.

4. This instant readership of some two dozen within a short time of the Letter/Article's publication is not surprising since Temasek Review gets some 50,000 unique readers a day.

5. Late on Sunday night, 2 days later, on 9 Jan 2010 around 9.21pm, I visited this Letter/Article again to see what new Comments and Like/Dislike clicks have been added AND WAS ASTONISHED THAT THERE WERE ONLY 2 MORE COMMENTS AND NO NEW LIKES/DISLIKES, MEANING THAT THERE WERE NO NEW READERS WHO CLICKED OR COMMENTED OVER THE ENTIRE SAT AND SUN, WHEN TEMASEK REVIEW READERSHIP IS HIGHEST!!!

6. It is possible that my Letter/Article was hidden from view since it was published on Fri 7 Jan. Or it was made unloadable so no new readers could download it. Considering the explosive nature of my revelations, this is not surprising and to be expected of LIE KY LHL WKS and their ISD dogs. When you routinely rig elections so you can remain in power and pay yourselves some >S$6m a year, hacking a dangerously explosive Letter/Article is also a routine of LIE KY LHL WKS ISD.

7. Now that I have exposed that the Singapore Govt not only rigs elections but also probably hacked Temasek Review website to hide my expose:

a. they may get their agents to click more Likes/Dislikes to give the impression that my Letter/Article is being 'read'

b. add some more Comments to give the same impression

8. To allow Temasek Readers to read this vitally important Letter/Article, can you please:

a. permanently put this Letter/Article right on top in some of your most-read Category, at least, and not remove it until after the coming General Election

b. send out my Letter/Article to your regular email subscription list or any other email list you may be able to obtain

c. ask your website administrators to check and watch if any suspicious hacking or hiding of my Letter/Article has taken place and to monitor activity OR LACK OF ACTIVITY on this vitally important Letter/Article.

Thank you [Mon 10 Jan 2010 11am Singapore Time]

Robert HO
28 Bukit Batok Street 52
#20-03 Guilin View
Singapore 659248
Tel: +65-68989553
CellPhone: +65-90127417

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Robert HO
Date: 2011/1/9

Subject: Temasek Review publishes my entire email/article on LIEgime elections riggings on Fri garnering 17 comments but Sun 9.21pm only 2 more comments? Fishy

http://www.temasekreview.com/2011/01/07/entire-prime-minister-office-on-holiday/

Entire Prime Minister Office on holiday?

January 7th, 2011 | Author: Contributions

Dear Temasek Review,

A. I have sent 2 copies of my earlier email [Subject: Query on when a ballot becomes "spoiled", what are the rules on markings on the BACK of ballot paper?] to:

LEE Seng Lup [Head, ELECTIONS DEPT under the Prime Minister's Office]
ANG Boon Chin [Deputy Head (Operations)]
LEE Hsien Loong [PM Singapore]
Mrs Connie CHAN [Private Secretary to Prime Minister].

B. I also pasted both these emails, one from my gmail account and one from my yahoo account, [so at least one will get through to their email inbox] in Temasek Review comments at:

http://www.temasekreview.com/2011/01/03/how-to-mark-your-ballot-slip/#comment-270191

C. That was 2 days ago. This morning, I phoned all the 4 recipients of my emails to try to follow up on my emails BUT NOBODY TOOK MY CALLS. ALL CLAIMED TO BE UNREACHABLE.

D. So, after the unsuccessful phone calls attempts, I sent both copies [gmail and yahoo] to another set of recipients, including LIE KY:

Miss YEO Lim, PBS [2 Private Secretary to Prime Minister]
GOH Chok Tong [Senior Minister]
Miss HO Phoon Meng, PB, PBS [1 Private Secretary to Senior Minister]
Mdm Cheong Lay Bee [2 Private Secretary to Senior Minister]
LEE Kuan Yew [Minister Mentor]
Miss WONG Lin Hoe, P. Kepujian, PB, PBS [1 Private Secretary to Minister Mentor]
KOH Kiang Chay, PB [2 Private Secretary to Minister Mentor]

E. By enlarging the pool of recipients to my double emails, I therefore ensured that I will be able to successfully phone at least one of them, when I try next week. I want firstly, an ACKNOWLEDGEMENT that they have received my email/s. Secondly, I want to know what they intend to do with my FOOLPROOF idea to prevent cheating in elections. I am confident that sooner, or later, other countries will adopt this simple and foolproof idea. When they do, LIE KY and LHL will have a difficult time explaining why they did not adopt my idea in the first place.

F. Please publish this in your Letters section so that the world can read the idea and therefore likely adopt it. With your huge readership of 50,000 unique readers a day, LIE KY and LHL cannot pretend to be unaware of my Letter or that my idea is not FOOLPROOF. At the very least, they will have to publicly acknowledge my Letter and publicly state their reasons why they do not adopt it — especially when some other jurisdictions adopt it. It is so simple and foolproof an idea that it cannot be ignored for long. They will probably also have to acknowledge the existence of Temasek Review, which will be a great acknowledgement!

G. Just to reassure you, if I am ever involved in a court case, whether criminal or civil, whether initiated by myself or other parties, I will have quite a few official statements of support from individuals and govts, maybe even some Heads of States like Presidents, PMs and their Ambassadors, etc. Time can change a winning hand into a losing hand and vice versa, and the Time is Right.

Thanks and regards,

Robert HO
6 Jan 2010.
//////////////////////

From: Robert HO
Date: Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 3:05 PM

Subject: Fwd: FOOLPROOF IDEA TO PREVENT ELECTION CHEATING, FOR ADOPTION WORLDWIDE. PLEASE ACKNOWLEDGE.

To: “inquiries2@un.org”

To:
Public Inquiries Unit
Department of Public Information
United Nations
New York NY 10017
Dear UN Public Inquiries Unit,

Please read and if this idea deserves, forward it to the highest possible officers especially Secretary-General Mr BAN Ki Moon. Thank you.

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Robert HO
Date: Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 2:37 PM

Subject: Fwd: FOOLPROOF IDEA TO PREVENT ELECTION CHEATING, FOR ADOPTION WORLDWIDE. PLEASE ACKNOWLEDGE.

To: “helen.beckman@ec.europa.eu” , “delegation-new-york-euinfo@ec.europa.eu” , “christopher.matthews@ec.europa.eu” , “cecile.fasulo@ec.europa.eu” , “shila.patel@ec.europa.eu”

To: EU contributions to International Election Monitoring, forward of an email to UN Electoral Assistance Division:

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Robert HO
Date: Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 12:52 PM

Subject: FOOLPROOF IDEA TO PREVENT ELECTION CHEATING, FOR ADOPTION WORLDWIDE. PLEASE ACKNOWLEDGE.

To: eadroster@un.org

Dear UN Electoral Assistance Division,
Postal Address:
S-3070
Electoral Assistance Division
Department of Political Affairs
United Nations Secretariat
New York, NY, 10017
United States of America
Telephone: +1 212 963 8737
Facsimile: +1 212 963 2979
General Enquiry Email Address: eadroster@un.org

I forward a Foolproof Idea to prevent election riggings and cheatings. The idea is simple and practical, suitable for even less developed countries and uneducated folks, who deserve fair elections even more than richer ones, since they have most to lose from unfair elections. Mr BAN Ki Moon, secretary-general of the UN, is aware of this idea, although unofficially. So, today, I formally and officially present you this idea in its entirety so that the world can discuss, evaluate and implement this. Once implemented, election riggings will be history. If fair elections is the fundamental basis of all govt legitimacy, then I am sure you will action this email all the way to Mr BAN Ki Moon. Please acknowledge this email so I can rest assured that it is on the way to the rest of the world, and to its rightful place in history. Thank you,

[To contact me for further discussion, etc]:

Robert HO
28 Bukit Batok Street 52
#20-03 Guilin View
Singapore 659248
Tel: +6568989553
CellPhone: +6590127417
Email: robert.ic019@gmail.com
Email: ic019@yahoo.co.uk

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Robert HO
Date: Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 11:16 AM

Subject: FOOLPROOF IDEA TO PREVENT FUTURE ELECTION RIGGINGS, SOON TO BE ADOPTED WORLDWIDE. PLEASE ACKNOWLEDGE.

To: yeo_lim@pmo.gov.sg, goh_chok_tong@pmo.gov.sg, wendy_ho@pmo.gov.sg, cheong_lay_bee@pmo.gov.sg, lee_kuan_yew@pmo.gov.sg, wong_lin_hoe@pmo.gov.sg, koh_kiang_chay@pmo.gov.sg

Cc: [RH: about 50 email recipients deleted]

To:
Miss YEO Lim, PBS [2 Private Secretary to Prime Minister]
GOH Chok Tong [Senior Minister]
Miss HO Phoon Meng, PB, PBS [1 Private Secretary to Senior Minister]
Mdm Cheong Lay Bee [2 Private Secretary to Senior Minister]
LEE Kuan Yew [Minister Mentor]
Miss WONG Lin Hoe, P. Kepujian, PB, PBS [1 Private Secretary to Minister Mentor]
KOH Kiang Chay, PB [2 Private Secretary to Minister Mentor]

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Robert HO
Date: Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 2:14 PM

Subject: Query on when a ballot becomes “spoiled”, what are the rules on markings on the BACK of ballot paper?

To: lee_seng_lup@eld.gov.sg, ang_boon_chin@eld.gov.sg, lee_hsien_loong@pmo.gov.sg, connie_chan@pmo.gov.sg

Cc: [RH: about 50 email recipients deleted]

Resent using my second email account, this one being my Yahoo mail. My earlier email sent seconds ago using my gmail account. This Yahoo account of mine is seldom used, so pristine and not blocked from govt servers, in case you use this as an excuse.

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Robert HO
Date: Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 2:08 PM

Subject: Query on when a ballot becomes “spoiled”, what are the rules on markings on the BACK of ballot paper?

To: lee_seng_lup@eld.gov.sg, ang_boon_chin@eld.gov.sg, lee_hsien_loong@pmo.gov.sg, connie_chan@pmo.gov.sg

Cc: [RH: about 50 email recipients deleted]

Dear

LEE Seng Lup [Head, ELECTIONS DEPT under the Prime Minister's Office]
ANG Boon Chin [Deputy Head (Operations)]
LEE Hsien Loong [PM Singapore]
Mrs Connie CHAN [Private Secretary to Prime Minister]

Dear SIRs,

I have posted a comment/query in the Temasek Review, the biggest socio-political website in Singapore, read by 50,000 unique readers a day, on when and how a ballot would be deemed and discarded as “spoiled”. I now pose this question to you for an official reply. To ensure you do reply, I cc this email to my regular email group of about 50 recipients, including the Straits Times Forum Page Editor. If my comment query in the Temasek Review is not deleted for being too long, and a repeat posting after several earlier postings, you can access it at this url:

http://www.temasekreview.com/2011/01/03/how-to-mark-your-ballot-slip/#comment-270191

I eagerly await your official reply. Thanks.

Robert HO:
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
January 4, 2011 at 1:43 pm (Quote)

DEAR “NO HOPE”, DO YOU KNOW OR CAN YOU FIND OUT IF MY IDEA BELOW, THAT IS, WRITING A PIN NUMBER ON THE BACK OF THE BALLOT PAPER, WILL SPOIL THE VOTE? DO THE ELECTION RULES SAY ANYTHING ABOUT THE BACK OF THE BALLOT? OR WOULD THE COURTS MAKE A RULING ON THIS AND IF SO, WHAT WOULD THEY RULE?

RH: [If links below do not become clickable urls, please copy & paste entire article into a HTML format so they become clickable links, sorry]:

IDEA: P.I.N. ON BACK OF BALLOT [PoBoB] PAPER ENSURES FAIR ELECTION AND PREVENTS FURTHER PAP CHEATING

RH:
1. This is probably the best idea for fair elections since the Greeks invented Democracy. We all know the main problem with elections — they are easy to cheat, especially by the ruling party or president. So this idea creates a Two Factor system to ensure fairness. It is based on the Two Factor Authentication [TFA] used by many banks offering online banking services. Because in the online world, like in the real world of elections, many opportunities exist for cheating, so online banking services created the TFA system to eliminate fraud. This works also for elections. I will here present the Idea, based on TFA, for your consideration, and I hope, eventual adoption. For the sake of simplicity, I will use a theoretical example of an election contest between only TWO parties [or 2 persons, in the case of a Presidential election] but the Idea works for any number of parties or presidential candidates. Let us begin by supposing that in a certain constituency, 100,000 voters voted. The exact even split of votes between Party O [Opposition] and Party PAP [or Presidential Candidate O and Presidential Candidate PAP] would be 100,000 /2 = 50,000 votes each. [In my example, O is the Good Guy and PAP the Bad Guy, of course].

2. Suppose O won by 1 vote, so he got 50,000 + 1 = 50,001 votes, meaning that PAP would get 49,999 votes, giving O a majority of 2 votes.

3. To cheat this election from a loss into a win, the PAP needs to either throw away or deliberately don’t count at least 3 Opposition votes, to give the PAP a majority of 1 vote. OR the PAP can ADD 3 fake votes to overcome the Opposition’s majority of 2 votes. Both methods are almost impossible to prevent and is probably done every election, given that the Election Dept which conducts every election is directly under the Prime Minister’s Office. “Elections are decided not by those who cast the votes but by those who count the votes” [said Stalin]. As long as there is no independent Election Commission, LIE KY will continue to rig every election. Hence the mathematically, statistically, electorally, politically impossible current result of winning 82 parliamentary seats out of 84!

[Paras F, C, D are from my blog article at

http://i-came-i-saw-i-solved-it.blogspot.com/2010/06/lky-lhl-wks-election-riggings-emailed.html]

F. On another note, another insidious Elections Dept practiceis a breach of election laws, too. At polling stations, voters queue up, then when their turn comes, they have to hand over their NRICs for identification. Well and good. This could be done silently, to the seated officials, who can then verify the voter's identity and hand him a ballot slip. However, the way the Elections Dept does it, the voter hands over his NRIC, not to the seated officials, but to another official who deliberately stands a distance from the seated officials, who checks the NRIC, THEN SHOUTS OUT TWICE THE NAME AND NRIC NUMBER OF THE VOTER. This not only intimidates the voter, who having been thus identified, has only the solace of a 3-sided cardboard booth to mark his ballot, quivering in fear that he might be observed marking his choice. In fact, if the secret police or ISD had previously installed hidden cameras to record how each voter voted, that is, which party he marked for, this visual footage, together with the audio recording of the voter's name and nric, makes it quick and easy to compile a complete list of HOW EVERY VOTER VOTED, given that each polling stations handles only a fixed, small number of voters, all pre-identified and alloted their particular polling station. Even if the top of the 3-sided cardboard booths are covered, which they are not, cheap Through The Wall Surveillance Cameras

[http://www.google.com.sg/search?hl=en&q=Through+The+Wall+Surveillance+imaging+devices&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=]

can ’see through’ the top covering. This makes it difficult for the voting to be secret, even if the voter covers his ballot slip when marking it.

C. The Elections Dept Returning Officers were party to this criminal election rigging because according to election laws, NO MORE BALLOT BOXES MAY BE ADMITTED FOR COUNTING ONCE COUNTING COMMENCES, TO PREVENT FRAUD, OBVIOUSLY. [The Returnoing Officer is duty bound to ensure that
all ballot boxes
are in place before allowing counting to commence.]

D. This means that the Election Dept, which is within the Prime Minister’s Office, was involved in the conspiracy and crime to commit election fraud, all premeditated, since the fake ballot boxes and fake PAP votes must all be prepared beforehand, probably also routinely done in every single General Election, which may explain the statistically, politically and electorally IMPOSSIBLE result of the PAP winning 82 out of 84 seats in Parliament!

4. However, cheating elections must be done with the fewest people knowing it, thus must be limited to the fewest, trusted henchmen. With LIE KY having lost most of his clout and being much less feared today than say, a few years ago, thanks largely to the internet and my 18 years of publicising his crimes, incompetence [unbelievable even 5 years ago but now accepted, thanks to my relentless analysis of his screw ups, flawed thinking and policies and sheer idiocy], LIE KY has little clout left to inspire fear let alone respect. I have proven that his trumpeted ‘achievements’ are no more than economic bubbles

[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jQCab3QZbBk]

of constantly increasing imports of foreign workers and constantly inflating prices of everything especially public housing HDB flats, both unsustainable. I have also proven why his singleminded pursuit of high GDP numbers has totally distorted the economy into a dinosaur, in danger of extinction once conditions change. From a seeming visionary and seer, he now seems more in need of a seeing-eye dog. Thus, it is entirely possible that leaks, even blogs, books and interviews may surface in the future exposing all of LIE KY’s election cheatings. Until then, here is an idea to deter, if nothing else, further PAP election cheatings.

5. Because this idea depends on the cooperation of the voters, it is very important, because it gives the voters the responsibility, individually, to ensure fair elections. Once they understand how they themselves, individually, can help ensure fair elections, you would have educated them on one of the most important responsibilities of citizenship. Once they understand the importance of fair elections, the climate for cheating elections will change forever. Currently, voting is reduced to a frustrating mere marking of a cross on a ballot paper and even this long awaited right to choose his govt is denied to most voters because of the GRC system

[http://www.google.com.sg/search?aq=1&oq=GRC+syste&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=grc+system+in+singapore].

Many voters have given up hope of effecting a change in govt despite voting against the PAP every election and taking the trouble of ranting anonymously online, some every single day.

6. Coming to the idea, which is very simple, as it must be, so that the ordinary, simple, even illiterate folk can understand it and do it correctly, the Voter, after marking his cross for the party he wants to vote for, turns the ballot paper over and writes a 4-digit PIN number. He must remember this PIN number that he has written on the ballot. But that is all he needs to do at this stage. So, very easy. Even the illiterate person knows about PIN numbers because he probably has to create and use a PIN to access his ATM machine. [Note that some of the 4-digit PIN numbers will be the same because different voters may well write the same number. However, this does not matter because the principle is that each Ballot will be confirmed by a PIN Letter -- with a small percentage of no-PINs, that is, voters who did not bother to write his PIN or send the Letter]. Thus, fake ballot papers cannot be prepared beforehand by Win-Win LIE KY, Win-Win 2A1B and DPM WKS as usual. Security, in practice, is never absolute and is effective enough as long as it makes cheating difficult. For example, in securing a premises, nothing is totally secure. Every lock can be broken, given time and effort. Security is thus, in practice, making it harder to cheat. Here, before we continue with the PIN idea, let us sidetrack a little to discuss the philosophy behind this idea. Meaning that by enabling the Voter to play his part in ensuring fair elections, this is an important lesson in civic education in itself, creating an important climate hostile to any election rigging or even unfairness, so that if news does break out about any cheating or attempt to cheat, the backlash will be all that greater.

7. Thus, all voters will be asked to remember his PIN and write his PIN on the top left hand corner of a white envelope, put the correct stamp on it, AND POST IT IMMEDIATELY ON ELECTION DAY AND CERTAINLY NOT AFTER, so that LIE KY cannot fake some of these PIN Letters and send them, for the purpose of matching his faked votes to the corresponding ‘correct’ fake PIN from fake Letters [see how hard cheating would become?]. Since each letter would be chopped and delivered as a normal letter, it would carry a post office chop and probably a time stamp or date chop as well [this can be arranged if LIE KY is forced to by public pressure to adopt this idea].

8. Since the PIN will be handwritten on the top left hand corner of a white envelope, it can be easily read by ordinary optical character reader [OCR] so no need for human reading [but do read by humans a percentage of such PIN Letters to ensure LIE KY does not cheat]. Currently, in the post offices, all postal code numbers are read by OCR, even handwritten postal code numbers, so this is easy.

9. Coming back to our constituency election results from para 1, 2, 3, LIE KY needs to fake 3 votes to win. If he cannot simply fake the total votes counted, that is, if the Opposition can get enough Counting Officials to ensure that the counting is indeed, honest, then he has to fake actual physical ballots. With our idea, this will be very difficult. Firstly, it is unlikely the Opposition’s [real] winning majority will be just a few votes; more likely several thousands. This means that LIE KY has to fake actual physical votes of several thousands to turn his loss into a win. Since every ballot paper will now need not only a cross against a party symbol and party name, but also a PIN on the back, this fact alone is a big deterrent and creates a difficult climate for cheating. It is one thing, very easy, to fake a cross on a fake ballot paper but very difficult to add a fake PIN on the back. Psychologically, it is a huge deterrent. The criminal faker feels very, very, wrong and criminal. He is totally aware he is committing a real, big, crime.

10. Now we come to how the PIN works. Suppose the voters all understand how important it is to write the PIN and to send his PIN Letter, so the number of voters who did not comply with this is only, say, 5%. That is, 5% of voters did not write their PIN or send their PIN Letter. This immediately means that LIE KY cannot fake more than 5% of the votes. [Each PIN Letter must also be marked for the constituency in which the voter voted. This can be easy by giving a separate letter box address for each constituency]. If a recount or check is required by the Opposition to tally each vote against its corresponding PIN Letter, and since there are only 5% no-PINs, meaning that there are 95% of PIN Letters, so 95% of the votes will be found to have a corresponding, correct, PIN Letter. If LIE KY fakes more than 5%, then the excess over 5% cannot be ‘explained’ by the excuse of no-PINs while 95% of the ballot papers will be correctly matched to a PIN Letter. LIE KY can ask all his PAP supporters not to write or send the PIN Letter but again, this involves many people in what is an obvious attempt to cheat elections. If LIE KY does this, his status drop to real 0 from his current near 0. Asking your supporters to facilitate your cheating elections not only drops your status to 0, but opens you to future blackmail from disgruntled former supporters. Or the whole cheating exposed in a blog or book or interview by a reputable tv station!

11. Because nobody can predict how many percent of no-PINs there will be, this uncertainty is a huge deterrent to LIE KY faking ballot papers. He can ask his post office to throw away a big percentage of such PIN Letters but this involves post office officials and workers, thus bad for cheating elections because election cheating must be done with the fewest people in the know. The more people who know, and the less the fear, loyalty and obedience LIE KY can inspire, which is very little nowadays, the more dangerous it is to involve the post office workers.

12. This idea works much like the online banks double safety method of Two Factor Authentication [TFA], which is a good argument for the Opposition to insist on having this system for all future elections. In TFA, when you type in your password, you get through only to the first stage of your online bank account. Almost immediately after you have typed in your password, the bank computer sends an SMS to your cellphone, whose number you have pre-registered with the bank. This SMS contains a random One Time Password or PIN number that you must then key into your online bank page within 10 minutes. Then, if BOTH factors are correct, then and only then, are you able to access your online bank account. This idea, by using 2 different procedures, one in which the Election Dept conducts the voting, and the second, in which the voter HIMSELF, INDIVIDUALLY, sends his PIN Letter to authenticate his vote on the ballot paper, thus ensures the fairness of the elections. The voter, by his own volition and initiative, thus plays the biggest part in ensuring fair elections. It is a way to put power back into the hands of the voter and people, who have for 51 years been intimidated into sullen, angry, obedient subservience. Power to the People!

13. This idea does not need the cooperation of the PAP govt. The Opposition can, preferably in unison, publicise this idea and ask all voters to cooperate. The PIN Letters can be sent to a friendly Embassy in Singapore and according to international laws and practices, all communications such as fax, email, letters, etc, to embassies must not be censored or prevented from arrival. Further, when the Opposition asks the voters to cooperate and they will, an informal pact is made between the Opposition and the voters, a very important outcome of this idea. This pact [wink, wink] is a pact between the Opposition and the people against the PAP govt cheating the elections [wink, wink]. The Opposition has been too afraid to quote my blog or my YouTube video or articles, so this is a good way to hint to the people, many of whom already know my works, that LIE KY, his son 2A1B, and his nephew in law, WKS, have all been cheating all this while and that together, the Opposition and the voters can stop them. There is thus, a pact between the Opposition and the people against the PAP LIEgime govt cheating the elections. This, in itself, will be an important civic lesson and experience.

14. If the Opposition and online netizens push for this idea, LIE KY 2A1B WKS etc will find it almost impossible to refuse or even argue against. It is like arguing against the double safety of online bankings’ Two Factor Authentication — you are against it only if you have criminal cheating intentions! Nobody argues against better security! So, once this idea is publicised, even LIE KY will have to implement it. The only argument against it is work, which in this case is so simple — just sending a letter — this argument of ‘too much work’ will not be taken seriously, meaning it will be counterproductive and exposes the anti-idea arguments as having intention to cheat elections.

15. We know that in Singapore, the counting of the ballots takes place in school halls and only authorised people are allowed in, on pains of criminal prosecution. The counters are mostly civil servants drawn from schoolteachers, other civil service depts, etc, all overseen by the Election Dept of the Prime Minister’s Office [PMO]. Thus, the entire operation is a govt operation directly run by the PMO. This, of course, is to facilitate the usual cheating by the LEEs. However, the Opposition are allowed a token presence in that the Opposition candidates WHO CONTESTED THE WARD can be admitted into the counting hall — but no others even from their party or even the leaders of the party.

16. In addition to the Opposition candidates who contested the ward, the Opposition are also allowed a fixed number of ’scrutineers’ or polling agents who can cursorily look on as the counters do their job. The problem is, most of these scrutineers or poll agents appointed by the Opposition are also PAP moles, for several reasons. Firstly, few people dare to volunteer for the Opposition. Secondly, the cheating LEEs have so much money and manpower resources that they can mobilise any numbers of ISD agents, PAP members, family members, etc, to disguise as Opposition supporters volunteering for polling agent service. Thus, other than the Opposition candidates who contested in the ward, hardly anybody can be trusted.

17. To counter this, the Organisers should unite to call for all the counting rooms to be fitted beforehand with CCTVs and even allowed television crews from local and foreign news services or UN or EU Election Monitoring Depts, or even reputable newsbloggers, etc, to videotape the entire proceedings. The CCTVs can be easily wired to large flat screen TVs outside the counting hall, for the assembled spectators and supporters of all parties and foreign journalists to watch. This is cheap and easy and done for many other events, like when a hotel conference room cannot hold enough audience so they televise the proceedings in the room to the outside tv screens. Very little expense or technical skills are needed. Idiotproof.

18. The benefit for every candidate is that this will confer an additional legitimacy, in addition to the PoBoB Idea. If both are implemented, it will be almost impossible to cheat. Meaning a truly legitimate candidate/s will form the next govt. Like in Egypt.

19. I got this idea by remembering a previous election in Indonesia, remembering a television footage in which the counting was transparent, with each ballot being held up to the crowd to see, then added to the winning ballot’s party symbol on a big board, this tallying also being totally visible to the assembled crowd of Indonesians.

20. If Indonesians can get such transparency, then why are our counting so secretive? For cheating by the LEEs, of course.

21. This PoBoB Idea + televised or CCTVed counting are so obviously fair and transparent procedures I cannot see anyone arguing against it — unless they want to cheat.

[To contact me for further discussion, etc]:
Robert HO
28 Bukit Batok Street 52
#20-03 Guilin View
Singapore 659248
Tel: +6568989553
CellPhone: +6590127417
Email: robert.ic019@gmail.com
Email: ic019@yahoo.co.uk

Note: LIE KY has been cheating elections for decades right from the beginning 51 years ago in 1959, so that he can pay himself:

S$3.9m basic pay + S$2.6m pension concurrent with pay [disallowed for all govt employees except Ministers] + secretly calculated GDP Bonus of estimated S$2m = S$8.5 + perks estimated at S$1m = S$9.5m a year.

THIS DOES NOT INCLUDE HIS VAST EARNINGS FROM HIS LAW FIRM OF LEE&LEE, TO WHICH HE CORRUPTLY DIVERTS MOST OF THE LEGAL WORK FROM GOVT DEPTS, STAT BOARDS AND GOVT COMPANIES. FOR EXAMPLE, PRACTICALLY ALL THE CONVEYANCING LEGAL WORK IN THE HDB IS DONE BY LEE&LEE, MEANING THE SALES AND RESALES OF HDB FLATS FOR BOTH BUYERS AND SELLERS PASS THROUGH HIS FIRM. HIS FIRM EARNS SO MUCH MONEY THAT HE ONCE BOASTED IN PARLIAMENT THAT HE WAS 'RELATIVELY UNDERPAID' COMPARED WITH HIS WIFE's EARNINGS IN THEIR LAW FIRM, THAT COMPARED TO HER, HIS 'RELATIVELY LOW SALARY' MADE HIM FEEL LIKE A "KEPT MAN"!!! SO YOU CAN SAFELY ADD ANOTHER S$100m TO HIS ANNUAL 'PAY'. PUBLIC SERVICE, FOR THIS TOTALLY STUPID, INCOMPETENT BUT ARROGANT MORON, REALLY PAYS AND PAYS AND PAYS... Proof of his election riggings below:–

RH: LKY LHL WKS ELECTION RIGGINGS EMAILED TO ALMOST ENTIRE GOVT:
http://i-came-i-saw-i-solved-it. blogspot. com/2010/06/lky-lhl-wks-election-riggings-emailed. html

ME ON VIDEO DESCRIBING lky lhl wks NUMEROUS ELECTION RIGGINGS + PoBoB and CCTV Ideas:
http://i-came-i-saw-i-solved-it. blogspot. com/search/label/%22A%20Video%20RH%20on%20LKY%20LHL%20WKS%20cheating%20elections%22

http://www. youtube. com/watch?v=jQCab3QZbBk

MY ACQUAINTANCE, MR DAVID DUCLOS, A FORMER POLICE INSPECTOR, AND HIS LAWYER FRIEND, EYEWITNESSED LEE KUAN YEW RIGGING THE 1997 CHENG SAN GRC ELECTION. READ MORE AT MY BLOG ENTITLED “I CAME, I SAW, I SOLVED IT” :
http://i-came-i-saw-i-solved-it. blogspot. com/

MY ONLINE POLICE REPORT ON LKY LHL WKS CHEATING ELECTIONS:
http://i-came-i-saw-i-solved-it. blogspot. com/2009/06/police-report-lee-ky-lhl-wks-cheating_02. html
.